“Restaurant surveillance shows Patrick Clancy promptly entered ThreeV and did not linger before picking up the order.”
@insnagramReel analyzed by Clear
“The restaurant footage supports a quick pickup, not a sweeping theory.”
Investigators documented that the restaurant video showed Patrick Clancy entering ThreeV at 5:54:14 p.m., briefly waiting behind another couple, and paying for the order at 5:55:01 p.m.
The post does not establish the identity or relationship of the other person shown, and restaurant footage alone cannot establish Patrick Clancy’s complete timeline beyond that location.
Those limits do not materially change the narrow claim about a prompt restaurant pickup.
Why Clear says this
A police affidavit based on the authenticated ThreeV surveillance video gives a 47-second interval between entry and payment, consistent with no substantial delay inside the restaurant. Trial reporting also confirms the footage was played for jurors and the restaurant employee identified Patrick Clancy entering.
Evidence
- A police search-warrant affidavit states investigators confirmed the surveillance system’s date and time were accurate.
- The affidavit records Patrick Clancy entering ThreeV at 17:54:14, briefly waiting behind a couple, then paying at 17:55:01.
- Trial coverage reported that surveillance of Patrick Clancy entering ThreeV was played for jurors and that a restaurant employee identified him.